Steel Mill Case Study
Background
Objectives
- Conduct an Assessment to identify Gaps in the current contractor management program.
- Develop a comprehensive contractor safety management program to mitigate risks associated with contractor activities.
- Enhance communication and coordination between contractors and the company contacts and employees.
- Ensure compliance with OHS regulations and industry best practices.
Methodology
- Initial Assessment and Gap Analysis
- Conducted a thorough review of the existing contractor safety management program.
- Reviewed contractor incidents and reports.
- Inspection and observation of contractor activities.
- Assessed the utilization of contractor third party for pre-qualification.
- Identified gaps and areas for improvement through site inspections, interviews, and document reviews.
Summary of Issues
- Incomplete Contractor Safety Management System documentation and implementation
- Not having a direct champion for the cause
- Lacking effective performance evaluation, reporting and trending metrics
- Siloed operations with limited communications
- Conducting hazard and risk assessment and control assurance too late in the contract process.
- Limited and varied scope of work definitions that included hazard identification, risk assessment and control identification
- Unstructured and non-standardized approach to contractor management.
- Approach
- Development of Contractor Safety Management Plan
- Key Stakeholder involvement to create engagement and buyin, as well as to make the program specific to their needs and operations.
- Workflow and process defined
- Created a detailed contractor safety management plan, including support tools and documents a RACI chart, policies, procedures, and guidelines for contractor safety that included key stakeholders such as procurement, project managers, contractor contacts and the union.
- Created a clearer process map to determine and conduct resident contractor work, emergency contractor work and constructor contractor work.
- Developed specific safety requirements for contractors, including pre-qualification criteria, safety training, and performance monitoring.
- Updated contractor agreement inclusions
- Updated work package inclusions within their specific procurement and maintenance processes and supporting tech.
- Revised onboarding and orientation process and inclusions.
- Updated the Hazard and Risk Register for whole plant utilization, including that of contractors.
- Implementation and Training
- Implemented the contractor safety management plan in phases, starting with high-risk areas.
- Conducted comprehensive safety orientation and training sessions for contractors, covering topics such as hazard recognition, emergency response, and safe work practices.
- Enhanced Communication and Coordination
- Established regular safety meetings and communication channels between the Steel Mill stakeholders, employees and contractors.
- Implemented a system for reporting and addressing safety concerns and incidents promptly.
- Monitoring and Continuous Improvement
- Established a monitoring system to track contractor safety performance and compliance with safety requirements.
- Conducted regular safety audits and reviews to ensure ongoing compliance and identify areas for further improvement.
Results
- Improved Contractor Safety Performance
- Achieved a significant reduction in contractor-related incidents and near-misses within the first year of implementation.
- Enhanced contractor adherence to safety protocols and procedures.
- Increased efficiency and effectiveness of position roles and processes around contractor utilization
- Decreased time downtime due to contractor issues
- Enhanced Safety Culture
- Reduced legal liability around utilization of contractors.
- Fostered a collaborative safety culture between the Steel Mill’s employees and contractors.
- Increased reporting of safety concerns and proactive hazard identification by contractors.
- Ensured compliance with relevant OHS regulations and industry standards.
- Received positive feedback from regulatory bodies during safety inspections and audits.
Conclusion
”Our time with As One was invaluable. Not only did they provide the structured process for us to follow, but their on site time coaching us through utilization and approaches left us in a position of self sufficiency.